Website Redesign US Cost in 2026: Budget & Process Guide

Why a Website Relaunch in the US in 2026 Is More Than a Design Update

Your website is where B2B pipeline begins in 2026. B2B buying groups average more than 10 people, take nearly a year, and conduct most of their research independently - often well before your sales team is ever contacted. A site that loads slowly, looks outdated, or fails to speak clearly to a financial or operational decision-maker does not just look bad. It costs you deals you never know you lost.

The numbers bear this out. McKinsey's B2B Pulse research found that buyers' comfort with remote and self-service spending jumped in 2024, including for orders worth $500,000 or more. According to the 2025 mid-year Middle Market Indicator from the National Center for the Middle Market, 84% of mid-market companies - businesses with $10M to $1B in annual revenue - projected revenue growth by Q2 2026. Growth-focused companies need sites that convert.

The Commercial Risk of Not Relaunching

An outdated site does not stand still - it actively works against you. Slow load times generate lower-quality leads and higher bounce rates. Technical debt accumulates: every delayed update costs more to address later. Accessibility gaps create growing legal exposure as ADA litigation against private companies continues to rise. And competitors who invest in their digital presence gain a structural pipeline advantage. This is why professional web development services have become a critical investment.

• Outdated sites often break on mobile; 50% of B2B queries now happen on mobile devices
• Analytics gaps mean decisions are made without data, making it impossible to measure what is working
• When your sales team is embarrassed to share the URL with prospects, that is a revenue problem
• Sites that marketing cannot update without developer involvement accumulate messaging debt alongside technical debt

What Makes 2026 Different for US B2B Companies

Several specific factors converge in 2026. Google's Core Web Vitals continue to be a ranking factor, and the bar for "good" performance is set by real user data, not lab tests. AI-assisted research by buyers raises the quality bar for on-site content and structure - your pages are now being read and summarized by AI tools before a human even clicks. CRM and marketing automation integrations are expected by enterprise buyers as standard, not as nice-to-haves. And the ADA Title II deadline in April 2026 for government entities is raising buyer expectations across all websites they evaluate as vendors.

Refresh vs Redesign vs Relaunch vs Replatforming for US B2B Companies

These four terms mean different things and carry very different costs and risks. Choosing the wrong scope is one of the most common and most expensive mistakes US B2B companies make. A company that budgets for a refresh when it actually needs a relaunch will either run out of money mid-project or end up with a superficially updated site that does not fix the underlying problems.

• Refresh: visual updates only - colors, fonts, images; no structural change; $3,000-$10,000; low risk; 2-6 weeks
• Redesign: new visual design and updated structure on the same CMS or platform; $15,000-$50,000; moderate risk; 6-12 weeks
• Relaunch: redesign plus content strategy, new architecture, integrations, and SEO migration; $30,000-$150,000+; requires full migration planning; 3-6 months
• Replatforming: moving from one CMS to another (for example, WordPress to Webflow or HubSpot); highest risk if redirects and SEO migration are not handled correctly; 3-8 months

Comparison: Scope, Cost, and Risk

How to Choose the Right Scope

If your CMS works and your architecture is sound, start with a redesign. If your platform is holding back your team or preventing the integrations you need, plan a relaunch with replatforming. If only the visuals are dated and everything else functions well, a refresh may be all you need. From our project experience, most mid-market B2B companies underestimate scope - they budget for a refresh when the actual business problem requires a relaunch. Many benefit from consulting a web design agency to assess the true scope before committing budget.

When a US B2B Company Should Relaunch Its Website in 2026

There are clear business and technical signals that tell you a relaunch is overdue. Acting on them before they become revenue problems is what separates proactive companies from reactive ones. A site that generates poor-quality leads, ranks below competitors for key searches, or cannot be updated without developer involvement is already costing you more than a relaunch would. This is where SEO services and strategic oversight become essential.

Signals That Tell You a Relaunch Is Needed

Business signals: rebranding, a new product line, entering a new US market segment, acquisition, or a leadership change that requires a new positioning story.

Performance signals: bounce rate above 70%, conversion rate below 2%, or declining organic traffic for six or more months. These numbers indicate a structural problem, not a content problem.

Technical signals: slow load times (LCP above 4 seconds on real-user data), poor mobile usability, an outdated CMS with known security vulnerabilities, or broken integrations with your CRM or analytics platform. Modern digital marketing strategies depend on reliable technical foundations.

Competitive signals: competitors consistently outranking you for your core service terms, or prospects mentioning that your site feels dated - this is a sales signal, not just a brand signal.

Common Triggers We See in US B2B Mid-Market Projects

• Marketing cannot update content without involving a developer or agency
• The sales team avoids sharing the website URL with qualified prospects
• The site fails accessibility checks and enterprise or government procurement requires WCAG compliance
• Analytics are broken or unreliable: strategic decisions are being made without usable data

When NOT to Relaunch

A relaunch is not always the right answer. If the core problem is messaging, not design or technology, start with a strategy and copy revision - it is faster and cheaper. If your team is not ready to own a new CMS, a more capable platform will just create a different kind of debt. And if there is no budget for post-launch support, a relaunch without maintenance will erode quickly - often faster than you expect.

What a Website Relaunch in the US Costs in 2026

US website relaunch costs in 2026 range from $15,000 for a limited scope to $150,000+ for complex mid-market builds. The most common range for B2B companies is $30,000-$80,000. According to the Clutch Web Design Pricing Guide for March 2026, the typical US web design agency rate is $100 to $149 per hour based on reviewed project data. Here is what each budget level delivers.

Cost Tiers for US B2B Companies in 2026

Post-Launch Support Costs

Post-launch support is a required line item in every relaunch budget, not an optional add-on. Sites without active support degrade in performance, accumulate security vulnerabilities, and lose the ROI of the initial investment faster than most companies expect.

• Small business maintenance: $500-$1,500/month ($6,000-$18,000/year)
• Mid-market B2B support: $1,500-$5,000+/month depending on SLA scope, analytics, CRO, SEO, and development needs
• Without a support retainer: emergency fixes, degraded performance, and security gaps accumulate - typically costing more in recovery than a retainer would have cost over the same period

What Actually Drives Website Relaunch Cost in the US

Cost is driven by business complexity, governance, and risk - not by page count alone. Understanding the real cost drivers lets you budget accurately, avoid scope surprises mid-project, and have honest conversations with your agency before the contract is signed.

• Discovery and strategy depth: the clearer your goals and ICP, the less waste in execution; discovery shortcuts show up as expensive scope changes later
• Content audit, rewrite, and migration volume: B2B sites with 100+ pages of legacy content require significant effort to audit, consolidate, rewrite, and redirect correctly
• Information architecture and navigation complexity: more personas, products, or service lines means more structural work, more design, and more QA
• Number of page types and design system depth: every unique template adds design and development cost; a modular, well-structured component library reduces it over time
• CRM, marketing automation, forms, and analytics integrations: HubSpot, Salesforce, and GA4 integrations add cost and significant QA time - from our project experience, integration QA takes 2-3x longer than expected
• SEO migration and redirect planning: a thorough URL mapping and 301 redirect plan is non-negotiable; skipping it risks 30%-70% traffic loss in the first 30-90 days
• Accessibility improvements: meaningful WCAG 2.1 Level AA work typically adds 5-15% to a project budget - much less than the cost of fixing it post-launch
• QA, browser and device testing, review cycles, and UAT: consistently under-budgeted on most projects; critical for B2B sites used by multiple personas across different devices and browsers

Myth vs Reality on Cost Drivers

A Low-Risk Website Relaunch Process for US Companies in 2026

A structured relaunch process reduces risk by separating each phase clearly, testing everything before going live, and defining who owns what at every stage. The most expensive relaunch problems - lost rankings, broken analytics, scope overruns, delayed launches - are almost always the result of skipping or compressing phases. Here is the process we use for US B2B projects.

Phase 1: Discovery and Strategy (2-4 weeks)

• Stakeholder interviews and ICP definition: who are you selling to, what do they care about, and what does a good lead look like?
• Competitive analysis and positioning audit: what are your top three competitors saying, and where is your differentiation?
• Content audit: what to keep, consolidate, delete, or rewrite - every page should have a defined purpose in the new architecture
• Technical audit: performance baseline, SEO health, integrations, and analytics status - before you build anything new, know where you are starting
• Success metrics definition: what does a successful relaunch look like in 90 days? Define this before design starts

Phase 2: Architecture and Design (4-6 weeks)

• Information architecture and sitemap: where every page lives and how it connects to the others
• Wireframes for key page types: homepage, core service pages, case studies, and contact - functional logic before visual design
• Design system and component library: consistent, reusable, and maintainable from day one
• Content brief and messaging framework: what each page says, to whom, and what action it drives
• Accessibility requirements defined and built into the design brief from the start - not added later

Phase 3: Development and Content (6-10 weeks)

• CMS setup and template development based on the agreed component library
• Content migration and redirect mapping: a URL mapping document is required; every old URL maps to a new destination
• Integration development: CRM, forms, analytics, and marketing automation, with full QA of lead routing and attribution
• Accessibility implementation: keyboard navigation, focus states, contrast ratios, alt text, and form labels
• Staging site QA: functional, performance, SEO, cross-browser, and mobile testing before anyone sees the new site externally

Phase 4: Pre-Launch and Launch (1-2 weeks)

• Redirect verification on staging: every mapped URL tested for correct 301 status codes
• Analytics and tracking QA: GA4, Search Console, and CRM connections verified against real test submissions
• Core Web Vitals check on staging using both lab data and, where possible, field data signals
• Stakeholder review and sign-off with a defined approval process and clear go/no-go criteria
• Coordinated go-live with redirect deployment and Search Console Change of Address tool where applicable

Phase 5: Post-Launch Monitoring (30-90 days)

• Daily Search Console monitoring for crawl errors, indexing issues, and ranking shifts in the first two weeks
• Analytics validation: are events, conversion goals, and CRM form submissions tracking correctly?
• Core Web Vitals monitoring using real-user field data as it accumulates in Search Console
• SEO performance baseline vs pre-launch to measure impact and catch early signals of problems
• 30, 60, and 90-day structured review checkpoints (covered in a dedicated section below)

SEO Migration in 2026: How to Relaunch Without Losing Rankings and Traffic

Over 60% of website redesigns cause a significant organic traffic drop when SEO migration is not planned. The risk is real and the consequences are commercially significant. One B2B SaaS company migrated from WordPress to Webflow without implementing proper 301 redirects and lost 58% of organic traffic and 41% of lead conversions in the first 30 days. Recovery from that kind of loss takes months, not weeks. Planning the migration correctly before launch is far less expensive than recovering from it afterward - which is why most US companies benefit from web design & development services with proven SEO expertise.

Google classifies a 301 as a permanent redirect - a strong signal that the redirect target should be treated as canonical, as documented in Google Search Central's guidance on site moves. Unlike a 302 or 307, a 301 causes Google to immediately prefer the new URL in search results. Redirect chains - where one redirect points to another - reduce signal strength and slow load time; resolve all chains before launch. Google's Search Console documentation recommends maintaining redirects for at least 180 days after a site move and keeping the old domain for at least a year.

Pre-Migration SEO Checklist

• Export the full list of currently indexed URLs from Google Search Console
• Identify top-performing pages by organic traffic, conversions, and backlinks - these are your highest-risk pages
• Map every old URL to its new URL (1-to-1 where possible); for pages being consolidated or deleted, redirect to the most relevant remaining page
• Test all redirects on staging before go-live; do not assume they work - verify every one
• Use server-side 301 redirects; JavaScript-based redirects are not reliably followed by Google

What to Monitor After Launch

For a well-executed migration, organic traffic typically returns to baseline in 2-4 weeks. When moving domains, use the Change of Address tool in Google Search Console to accelerate re-indexing of the new site.

Accessibility in the US: ADA Guidance, the 2024 DOJ Rule, and Practical 2026 Implications

The April 2026 ADA Title II deadline applies to state and local governments - not to private B2B companies. This distinction matters and is frequently misrepresented. However, ADA Title III already applies to private businesses open to the public, accessibility lawsuits against private sites are increasing every year, and enterprise procurement increasingly requires WCAG compliance from vendors. US B2B companies planning a relaunch in 2026 need to understand what applies to them - and why accessibility is worth investing in regardless of the specific legal deadline.

Title II vs Title III: What Applies to Your Business

As documented on ADA.gov, the April 2026 Title II deadline is for government entities. ADA Title III still requires "full and equal enjoyment" for people with disabilities - and courts are increasingly extending this to include websites of private businesses. AI-assisted legal tools are lowering the barrier to file ADA accessibility complaints, and the volume of such complaints against private companies has grown steadily.

The Business Case for Accessibility Beyond Legal Risk

• Enterprise and government buyers increasingly require WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance from vendors as part of their procurement process
• Accessible design improves usability for all users, including an aging workforce, users on mobile, and users with temporary impairments
• WCAG conformance built in during a relaunch typically costs 5-15% of the project budget; retrofitting it after launch costs 3-5x more
• Better heading structure, color contrast, and keyboard navigation also improve SEO signals and Core Web Vitals scores - the reason many companies combine accessibility work with AI SEO strategies during relaunch

Practical Accessibility Checklist for a 2026 US B2B Relaunch

• Keyboard navigation throughout: all interactive elements reachable and operable without a mouse
• Correct heading hierarchy (H1 through H6): no skipping levels, no decorative headings used for sizing
• Color contrast: 4.5:1 ratio for normal text, 3:1 for large text
• Visible focus states on all buttons, links, and form fields
• Alt text for all meaningful images; empty alt for decorative images
• Form labels properly associated with their inputs using HTML label elements
• Plain-language error messages that describe what went wrong and how to fix it
• Video captions where applicable
• Accessible PDFs and downloadable materials

Core Web Vitals and Technical Performance for US B2B Websites in 2026

Google uses real-user Core Web Vitals data as a ranking factor, measured at the 75th percentile of actual visitors. Pages in position 1 in Google search show a 10% higher Core Web Vitals pass rate than pages in position 9. A 1-second delay in load time reduces conversions by approximately 7%. For a B2B site generating $100,000 per month in pipeline, that is $84,000 per year in lost revenue from a single second of unnecessary latency. Performance is not a technical detail - it is a commercial factor, and it belongs in every relaunch budget conversation.

Core Web Vitals Thresholds

Source: web.dev - Web Vitals. Google measures these at the 75th percentile of real users via the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX). The Search Console Core Web Vitals report reflects this field data, not lab simulations.

What Drives Poor Core Web Vitals on B2B Sites

• Unoptimized images: the most common cause of poor LCP scores on content-heavy B2B pages
• Render-blocking JavaScript and CSS: scripts that load before the page renders delay LCP and INP
• Third-party scripts - chat widgets, analytics tags, retargeting pixels - that fire early and compete for main-thread time
• Unstable layout from images or embeds that load after the page structure is set (CLS)
• Poor hosting or CDN configuration: a fast site on a slow server still fails
• Heavy CMS themes with unused components loaded on every page

Platform Performance Notes

• WordPress with page builders: high risk of Core Web Vitals failure without disciplined optimization; requires active performance management
• Webflow: generally strong CWV baseline if built correctly; hosting and CDN are included
• HubSpot CMS: solid baseline performance; third-party script load needs active management
• Custom builds: best potential performance ceiling but requires disciplined front-end engineering

How a Relaunch Should Improve Lead Generation, Trust, and CRM Handoffs

A relaunch is not just about looking better. It is about generating better leads, qualifying them earlier in the process, and handing them to sales with context. This is where B2B relaunches create direct revenue impact. One US industrial manufacturer went from 1 lead per quarter to 120+ leads and 1,462% traffic growth after a relaunch that added analytics, structured content pathways, and gated lead capture. That kind of shift does not come from a new color palette. It comes from building the site around how buyers actually research and make decisions.

What Changes in a Lead-Focused Relaunch

• ICP-aligned messaging: homepage and service pages speak directly to founders, marketing leaders, and revenue leaders in plain English - not to technical audiences who already know the terminology
• Content pathways: guide different personas (technical, commercial, financial, operational) to the right information and to a clear next action
• Lead capture that works: forms connected to CRM, confirmation emails automated, lead routing configured by source or intent signal
• Case studies and proof: the single most important trust element for B2B buyers evaluating a vendor for the first time
• Comparison pages: buyers research alternatives whether you help them or not; owning that conversation on your own site builds authority

CRM and Marketing Automation Integration Requirements

Integration quality determines whether the relaunch investment shows up in your pipeline data or disappears into an attribution black hole. Every form submission should flow to your CRM with clean source data, UTM parameters intact, and automated follow-up triggered. From our project experience, CRM integration QA consistently takes 2-3x longer than initially scoped - budget for it explicitly.

• HubSpot, Salesforce, or equivalent connected at the form and landing page level
• UTM parameter tracking preserved through form submission and into the CRM record
• Lead source attribution working at the campaign level, not just labeled as "website"
• Automated follow-up sequences triggered immediately on form completion

Trust Architecture

B2B buyers shortlist vendors before first contact. The elements on your site that build trust before that first conversation determine whether you make the shortlist at all.

• Clear service positioning: what you do, who you do it for, and what results look like
• Social proof: client logos, named case studies, and specific industries served
• Team and credentials: B2B buyers want to know who they are actually hiring
• Contact accessibility: phone number, calendar booking link, and a physical US address or office location for credibility

The Most Expensive Website Relaunch Mistakes US Companies Make

Most costly relaunch mistakes are predictable and preventable. The common thread running through all of them is underestimating scope, skipping planning phases, or treating the relaunch as a design project rather than a business transition. Each mistake below has a specific commercial cost - not just an abstract risk.

Mistake 1: No SEO Migration Plan

Consequence: 30%-70% organic traffic loss in the first 30-90 days after launch. One B2B SaaS company migrated from WordPress to Webflow without implementing redirects and lost 58% of organic traffic and 41% of lead conversions in 30 days. Recovery required months of remediation work.

Fix: map every URL before design starts; test all 301 redirects on staging; monitor Search Console daily for the first two weeks after launch.

Mistake 2: Skipping the Content Audit

Consequence: migrating duplicate, thin, or outdated content to the new site degrades SEO quality and credibility with buyers who find it. It also makes the new site harder to navigate.

Fix: audit all existing pages before starting design; decide what to keep, merge, delete, or rewrite. Every page should have a defined purpose before it migrates.

Mistake 3: Analytics Not Set Up Before Launch

Consequence: no pre-launch baseline, no way to measure relaunch impact, and no reliable data for CRO decisions in the first 90 days. You will not know if the relaunch worked.

Fix: define analytics requirements in discovery; QA all tracking events and conversion goals on staging before go-live.

Mistake 4: No Post-Launch Support Plan

Consequence: performance degrades, security vulnerabilities accumulate, content goes stale, and CRM integrations break quietly. The commercial ROI of the relaunch erodes within 6-12 months.

Fix: contract a support retainer before launch, not after the first problem surfaces. Know who you call and what the response time is.

Mistake 5: Choosing a Platform the Team Cannot Own

Consequence: marketing cannot update content without developer time; every content change becomes a cost center and a delay. The site accumulates messaging debt faster than it can be addressed.

Fix: evaluate CMS options against your team's actual technical capability and your editorial workflow, not against the agency's preferred platform.

Mistake 6: Underestimating Stakeholder Complexity

Consequence: review cycles multiply, scope expands mid-project, and launches are delayed by weeks or months. Every delay costs money and erodes stakeholder confidence.

Fix: define stakeholder roles and approval authority in the project kickoff. Decide who has final say on each type of decision before the project starts.

Mistake 7: Treating Accessibility as an Afterthought

Consequence: accessibility fixes implemented after launch cost 3-5x more than building them in from the start. And if a procurement requirement surfaces after launch, the cost of remediation can be significant.

Fix: include accessibility requirements in the design brief and QA checklist from the beginning of the project.

What the First 30, 60, and 90 Days After Launch Should Look Like

The 90 days after a relaunch are as important as the build itself. This is the window when you confirm the migration worked, fix issues before they compound into larger problems, and establish the data foundation for ongoing optimization. Without a structured post-launch process, small problems become expensive ones - and the improvement you launched the site to achieve never fully materializes.

Days 1-30: Stabilize and Monitor

• Monitor Google Search Console daily for crawl errors, coverage drops, and ranking shifts - especially in the first two weeks
• Validate all analytics: GA4 events, conversion goals, CRM form submissions, and UTM tracking working end-to-end
• Check Core Web Vitals in Search Console (field data updates weekly; allow 1-2 weeks for accumulation)
• Verify all 301 redirects are active and returning correct status codes across all mapped URLs
• Address critical bugs reported by internal teams or external users before they affect lead generation
• Submit the updated sitemap to Google Search Console

Days 31-60: Measure and Adjust

• First SEO performance review: organic impressions, clicks, and keyword positions vs the pre-launch baseline
• Conversion rate comparison by page: are key pages performing better, the same, or worse than before the relaunch?
• CRM lead quality review: are leads from the new site better qualified for your sales team?
• Content gap review: what questions are visitors asking or searching for that the site does not answer?
• Page-level Core Web Vitals review for any key pages underperforming on field data

Days 61-90: Optimize and Plan

• Second SEO performance review: traffic recovery confirmation or escalation plan if recovery is lagging
• Iterate on key landing pages based on heatmap data, session recordings, and form analytics
• Review analytics attribution: is source and medium data clean and consistent across channels?
• Plan the first content additions based on real search demand and buyer questions surfaced in this period
• Post-launch retrospective with internal stakeholders: what worked, what to improve in the next iteration

What a Good Support Retainer Covers

A retainer is not just a safety net - it is the mechanism that converts a one-time launch into a continuously improving commercial asset. It should include: monthly or bi-weekly performance reviews, CMS updates and security patches, analytics monitoring and alerting, development time for iterations and new landing pages, and SEO monitoring covering rankings, backlinks, and technical health.

How to Choose a Website Relaunch Partner for the US Market

The right relaunch partner for a US B2B mid-market company is not the one with the most impressive portfolio or the lowest price. It is the one that understands your business goals, has a structured and documented process, and can own the full scope - from strategy through post-launch support - without handing off critical phases to third parties.

What to Evaluate

• Does the agency cover strategy, UX, development, SEO migration, integrations, and support - or do they hand off parts of the process to partners or subcontractors?
• Have they executed B2B relaunches with similar scope, industry, and technical complexity? Can they show measurable results?
• Do they have a defined SEO migration process? Can they share a sample URL mapping document and explain their redirect QA process?
• Do they build for accessibility by default, or add it as a billable option?
• What does post-launch support look like specifically? Is there a retainer model, a defined SLA, and a named contact for your account?

Red Flags

• No discovery phase: jumping directly to design without first understanding your business, ICP, and goals
• No SEO migration plan included in the project scope
• No staging environment or documented pre-launch QA process
• Vague post-launch support described as "we will be available if you need us"
• All-in-one pricing with no line items: impossible to compare accurately or adjust scope correctly

Questions to Ask in the Selection Process

Why the Partner Relationship Matters Long-Term

A website is never finished. SEO, CRO, integrations, and content evolve as your business grows and as buyer behavior changes. The best ROI on a relaunch comes from ongoing optimization, not a one-time launch event. From our project experience, B2B companies that maintain a long-term relationship with their relaunch partner consistently see better outcomes than those who treat the project as a one-time transaction and manage the site internally without structured support.

Conclusion: A Website Relaunch in the US in 2026 Is an Investment in Growth and Stability

A website relaunch done right is a strategic investment that pays off in better pipeline, higher search visibility, lower long-term maintenance cost, and stronger trust with US B2B buyers who are already evaluating you before your sales team ever speaks to them. The companies that see the best results treat it as a business transition - not a design project - and bring the same discipline to migration, analytics, and post-launch support as they do to the design and development itself.

• A relaunch is a business transition: it requires strategy, SEO migration, performance work, accessibility, and post-launch ownership to deliver its intended ROI
• For US B2B mid-market companies in 2026, the realistic budget range is $30,000-$80,000 for most projects; complex builds reach $150,000+
• SEO migration is the highest-risk phase: over 60% of redesigns cause traffic drops when it is not planned; recovery takes months
• The April 2026 ADA Title II deadline applies to state and local governments; ADA Title III already covers private businesses and litigation against private sites continues to rise
• Core Web Vitals targets: LCP at or below 2.5 seconds, INP at or below 200 milliseconds, CLS at or below 0.1
• Post-launch support is not optional: sites without a structured retainer degrade and lose the ROI of the relaunch within 6-12 months
• Choosing the right partner - one that covers the full process from strategy through long-term support - is the most consequential decision in the project

If you are planning a US website relaunch in 2026 and want a clear picture of your goals, migration risk, realistic budget range, timeline, and support model, book a relaunch audit or strategy call with the Webdelo team. We will review your current site, define the scope that fits your business goals, and give you an honest assessment of what a low-risk relaunch looks like for your company. Book your website relaunch audit with Webdelo.